Boy things SURE were different before Bush. - Printable Version +- VadaVaka (https://vadavaka.com/forums) +-- Forum: Debates and Polls (https://vadavaka.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Debates (https://vadavaka.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +--- Thread: Boy things SURE were different before Bush. (/showthread.php?tid=3259) |
Boy things SURE were different before Bush. - Guest - 02-05-2004 Here is an interesting collage of quotes from Clinton era politicians and what they had to say about Iraq then. It's funny how most of these liberals changed their tune about the same subject since a Republican is in office. They call Bush a 'liar'now? Seems like these things were already said once before about Iraq. "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "Iraq is a long way from [the USA, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since ! 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001 "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our se! curity." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep. - Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members .. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 Boy things SURE were different before Bush. - evil_admin - 02-05-2004 Here is a quote from David Kay the CIA's chief weapons inspector until he resigned recently: Iraq's weapons and facilities, he [Kay] says, had been destroyed in three phases: by allied bombardment in the 1991 Gulf War; by U.N. inspectors in the half-decade after that war; and by President Clinton's 1998 bombing campaign. (Clinton's airstrikes, by now widely forgotten, were even at the time widely dismissed as a political diversion; they took place during the weekend when the House of Representatives voted for impeachment. But according to Kay, they destroyed Iraq's remaining infrastructure for building chemical weapons.) Kay adds that Saddam tried to resuscitate some of these programs, butâdue to sanctions, fear of inspections, and lack of resourcesâhe was not able to do so. End Quote So Clinton finished the job but the Republicans were too focused on impeaching Clinton to notice....makes you want to go hmmmmmmmm Boy things SURE were different before Bush. - Wha? - 02-05-2004 Oh man I have to remember this... If other people tell the same lie as you, it is no longer a lie, and you're off the hook. ::PostScript:: Tak the Cruel Posted on Feb 5 2004, 05:13 PM Wrote:Here is an interesting collage of quotes from Clinton era politicians and what they had to say about Iraq then. It's funnyUh... you may want to rephrase that.. Only the first 7 are prior to bush, so the rest were neither clinton era, nor a changed tune once a republican was in office. I'm sorry if I threaten the precious line in the sand between republicans and democrats, but the two are virtually identical. Boy things SURE were different before Bush. - Guest - 02-05-2004 I have to say that I worry if a 'Bush' appears to be talking back at me... especially if I'm trying to eat. Boy things SURE were different before Bush. - Guest - 02-05-2004 The era is irrelevant Wha. It even gives more lopsidedness to their original arguements that the majority of the Democrats DID think and said that there was a danger of WMB's in Iraq and did up to a very recent time. That line in the sand was drawn over many years, but it looks like most were standing on the same side before the line became voter issues. Didn't 9 of those 22 missiles go astray and land in Bhagdad neighborhood on that bombing campaign? No one denies Clinton had the ability to drop some bombs...he did a real crash/bang job before in Somolia and Bosnia. |