War/Iraq/Bush/Terrorism

[g-boy]

No reason to flame, it's a debate, there are opposing sides. I agree, something should have been done back then... we could have finished the job, the coalition said "let's stop" and bush sr. complied. And it's not as if we're getting revenge for something 12 years ago, it's that he hasn't disarmed in 12 years. Don't bring Korea into the picture, that's a different issue. There is no use making comparisons. The United States used nuclear weapons on Japan to end WWII. They shouldn't have been used, Japan was going to surrender anyway, as long as they could keep their emporer (we let them keep the emporer anyway), and probably the reason they were dropped was because Truman was put in office, didn't know the full facts, and just followed the advice of military advisors. So that's a thin argument. Sure we have WOMD, but are we going to use them on innocent people? No.... unless somehow Bush goes insane and decides to nuke the Middle East, but that's not gonna happen. It's a bold statement to say we're trying to start WW3... it's not like we haven't gone to war with Iraq before, and our technology has advanced and their military is weaker. WW3 means nuclear war... we're not going to use nukes, Iraq probably doesn't have the capability yet. The only countries I fear would use nukes are Pakistan and India.
I'm not political analyst, I'm no expert. Just opinions and counter-arguments, no disrespect at all.