Call me a fence sitter, but I want combinations of all three propositions. If someone is using an AWP (for example) and it comes up to the admins that it needs to be changed then the admins will have to decide. I know GRITS doesnât like it, when one of the admins bans the awp without telling anyone. When it goes to the admins, most of the admins have to agree on the course of action, no sr admin should have veto power over anyone except possibly GRITS/VAD. Is there anyway possible to do a vsay that only admins have the ability to read and to vote? Its an easy way to see the results. I want to leave all the guns and shields in the game. I donât think anyone of us has played long enough to know how each item affects the game. I think the dev team have quite a lot more experience in dealing with this stuff then we do. All the weapons have their advantages and disadvantages; it should be up to the player to adjust. If someone is awping, you can try blinding them, or using an auto sniper to try and get them down quite a bit. Shields, again blind or use an HE nade.
Beastie I'm all for the no whining, I think as ricochet players we are above that, even though I myself have whined on many occasions. As admins I think we have to decide which is a whine and which is a legitimate logical complaint. "He killed me with the AWP", probably a complaint
"He killed 90% of our team with the AWP" probably a legitimate complaint.
Beastie I'm all for the no whining, I think as ricochet players we are above that, even though I myself have whined on many occasions. As admins I think we have to decide which is a whine and which is a legitimate logical complaint. "He killed me with the AWP", probably a complaint
"He killed 90% of our team with the AWP" probably a legitimate complaint.