pentagon

[Gwarsbane]

There are some points here that had to do with the conversation over on MekTek but I will leave everything as it is over there...

First off to dispell something, the towers were designed to survive a hit from the largest plane at the time, which was 727 or 737 I believe.  Both of which are much smaller then a 747.

Second of all the Pentagon was never designed for a direct hit by a nuke.  When it was build nukes were very small and in accurate.  Today a single warhead could easily blow away the pentagon.

3rd if this was a missile that looked like a plane that was fired at the pentagon by people in their own government, how the heck did they get the thing ready so quick and fire it off.

4th a cruse missle is no where near the size of a 747.  If you mistake a curse missle for a 747 then you need glasses.

5th a missle and a jet sound basically the same, LOUD!  If the missle was the same size as the 747 then it would should pretty much like it.


6th planes are strong but fragile.  The plane could have dove into the building, and while the front of the plane gets squished in it pushes stuff towatds the back and makes the hole.  Meanwhile as the plane is still crashing in the front, the wings get folded back due to the reenforced structure and still have motion so they get brought into the build with the rest of the plane.

Where do the wings fold at, who knows, it could be near the tips it could be near the middle, it could be right where they meet the rest of the plane.  My guess is around the middle somewhere.

BTW I believe it was the C ring that it penatrated.  (thought it went a to e ring from the outside in, but by the looks of this image it goes from inside out)  So the plane hit and went through e, made a smaller hole in d and made a small exit hole in c.

http://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/WTC/pentagon_na...avy_command.gif
Here is a arial shot of the hole
http://website.lineone.net/~bosankoe/exit_hole_c.jpg

Also the outter skin of the pentagon might be able to survive a distant nuke blast but the inner parts don't have to after all the outer part should deflect it so the inner parts are not as stong as the outer skin.


7th aircraft fuel burns a heck of a lot hotter then normal gas.  We're talking REALLY hot.  Hot enough to melt thick steal beams that hold up buildings.  Aluminum melts at alot lower tempture.  That easily explains why there was nothing left of the plane inside after all the hours that the pentagon was burning.  Same with the engines, they are not solid steel they are made out of thin materal that could easily melt in that kind of heat.

Oh hey what do you know, something of the engines did survive...
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/trb.jpg

Also planes break up differently.  At one crash sight you could have basically a whole plane with only a few parts missing and when you look at it it looks like a plane.  Or you could have another crash of the exact same type of plane and find nothing bigger then a piece of bread.



I beleve in the towers they only found 1 or 3 engines and thats cause they went completly through.  Same with other parts of the plane.

I found these images just doing a quick seach for "pentagon engine" on google.
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/de...is/debrisHR.jpg
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/lawn4.jpg
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/lawn3.jpg
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/lawn2.jpg

8th the pentagon has a highway infront of it which is up higher then the grass, maybe that is the ground it hit first.  With the next image you can see that there are light poles that are not that tall knocked over.  I missle would not have done that and kept on going straight.

http:/bertyboy.free.fr/misc/attack/2001...n_plane/cab.jpg



I'm sure I'm missing parts here but I have proved my point.  There was no conspiracy.