This topic will never be answered until you prove the age long debate of which actually happened: creationism or evolution (or a combination of both).
If you are a creationist, you belive that God created everything out of nothingness; the waters, the land and animals. Then he had all the creatures come
to Adam to be named. If this actually happened, then I doubt that there was a marching line of various animal eggs rolling down the Garden of Eden waiting
for recognition. If you believe in Evolution, then cellular organization began from the smallest sustainable organisms and developed into adaptive, colony organisms
which developed into the cell systems we saw later. Don't confuse a developing embryonic egg with a simple organism thriving and living on its own. The earliest
developing organisms were reproducing via fission and conjugative processes we see today in bacterial life cycles.
All in all, until someone proves the correct start of life and wins the greatest Nobe Prize ever, this topic will continue to be just what it is: a debate. I figure we will
all find out the answers one dark day when our lights go out, but it is fun to discuss now.
I believe on a personal level that there is a blend of both creationism and adaptation. I believe in a higher power controlling evolution in the species so that they
adapt to their surroundings. There is no doubt that organisms react and develop survival characteristics to keep on being on top. But as for the chicken and the egg,
I agree I eat them both and I'm glad they're here, regardless of which one came first.
If you are a creationist, you belive that God created everything out of nothingness; the waters, the land and animals. Then he had all the creatures come
to Adam to be named. If this actually happened, then I doubt that there was a marching line of various animal eggs rolling down the Garden of Eden waiting
for recognition. If you believe in Evolution, then cellular organization began from the smallest sustainable organisms and developed into adaptive, colony organisms
which developed into the cell systems we saw later. Don't confuse a developing embryonic egg with a simple organism thriving and living on its own. The earliest
developing organisms were reproducing via fission and conjugative processes we see today in bacterial life cycles.
All in all, until someone proves the correct start of life and wins the greatest Nobe Prize ever, this topic will continue to be just what it is: a debate. I figure we will
all find out the answers one dark day when our lights go out, but it is fun to discuss now.
I believe on a personal level that there is a blend of both creationism and adaptation. I believe in a higher power controlling evolution in the species so that they
adapt to their surroundings. There is no doubt that organisms react and develop survival characteristics to keep on being on top. But as for the chicken and the egg,
I agree I eat them both and I'm glad they're here, regardless of which one came first.