A person that cant contribute to the world with any meaning, and commits a terrible crime, shouldnt expect to be taken care of the rest of his life but the same people that he committed the crime against, but in turn we cant let him go free to do the unspeakable again, so we are at a crossroad that will make some people feel as though we have committed justice were other see it as another crime. We dont do this on a stage for the world to see so that we may gain acceptance, we do it to protect ourselfs from this person and any acts of violence that he would do in the future. It is a deterrent of sorts because you know full well that if you commit a crime of this nature the punishment has been spelled out for you and your fate sealed, so you care not for your fate, or for the fate of the person you kill, if you go ahead and do the deed. IMO
sidenote...I think if we killed them directly after the trial it would be unjust, because time will tell if we convicted an innocent man, also I believe we should do a better job defending him in trial so that we are sure of his guilt before his death sentence is carried out, I think our system is flawed but not corrupt
sidenote...I think if we killed them directly after the trial it would be unjust, because time will tell if we convicted an innocent man, also I believe we should do a better job defending him in trial so that we are sure of his guilt before his death sentence is carried out, I think our system is flawed but not corrupt