While that approach gave some thought I don't see the difference.
You're saying if someone whoops another player fast enough to get 10 wins, and the other players win with less than 5, that person isn't the best?
All 3 of them play each other therefore everyone has an equal chance to score higher...
Using wins is more than fair. You have to beat your opponent in 3 rounds to get 1 win.. Honestly if someone gets beat that quick by one of the players, then I think they are the best since they play the other player(whom if is as equal should get as high points).
To sum it up, you're saying they are all equally good , but if that's so they should all have a fair chance at becoming top score in one of their matches since they play the same people.
You're saying if someone whoops another player fast enough to get 10 wins, and the other players win with less than 5, that person isn't the best?
All 3 of them play each other therefore everyone has an equal chance to score higher...
Using wins is more than fair. You have to beat your opponent in 3 rounds to get 1 win.. Honestly if someone gets beat that quick by one of the players, then I think they are the best since they play the other player(whom if is as equal should get as high points).
To sum it up, you're saying they are all equally good , but if that's so they should all have a fair chance at becoming top score in one of their matches since they play the same people.
<@Miagi> !8 Am I spamming?
<@ChanServ> Miagi: Yes.
<@Miagi> !8 Should I stop?
<@ChanServ> Miagi: Oh, please, PLEASE, make it stop!
<@ChanServ> Miagi: Yes.
<@Miagi> !8 Should I stop?
<@ChanServ> Miagi: Oh, please, PLEASE, make it stop!