Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dr. Laura Schlessinger
#1
Dr. Laura Schlessinger, US radio personality, dispenses advice to
people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that as an
observant Orthodox (Person of the jewish faith), homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus
18:22 and cannot be condoned in any circumstance.

The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a US
resident,which was posted on the Internet:

Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I
have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that
knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the
homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus18:22
clearly states it to be an abomination.
End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific
laws and how to follow them.

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a
pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev. 1:9).
The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to
them. Should I smite them?

B) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in
Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price
for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her
period of menstrual uncleanness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is, how do
I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and
female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of
mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians.
Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath.
Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally
obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an
abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality.
I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have
a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses.
Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair
around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by
Lev.19:27. How should they die?

i) I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes
me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two
different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of
two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend).

He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that
we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone
them?(Lev.24:10-16)
Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we
do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you
can help.


Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and
unchanging. Your devoted disciple and adoring fan.
Reply
#2
I was wondering when this would show up.. heh.
Reply
#3
Amen.
Reply
#4
I wanna see the responses to these now...
Reply
#5
I disagree with everything that woman says. How she is a Dr. is beyond me. Maybe i will have to get my own radio show and invite her on, then she cant hang the phone up on me.
Reply
#6
Dr. just means you got a doctorate... you can get a doctorate in pretty much any subject.
Reply
#7
man, I feel sorry for the jewish people now, having to follow all that crap. makes my priest look alot better. :ghost:
Reply
#8
The old testament is part of the christian bible too.
Reply
#9
actually, this whole letter to dr. laura was copied from a very similar argument that took place on the donahue (or geraldo) show years ago regarding this same issue.
Reply
#10
"Dr" Laura reminds me of Marilyn Musgrave, the congress woman spearheading that horribly oppressive amendmant. She claims that she supports it because it is unconstitutional, but is really supporting it because she hates gays.

I don't understand how we don't see this as just as bad as segregational laws. In 1950 a national poll was taken and 97% of the country was against interracial marriages. Anyone know when the last anti-interracial marriage law was repealed?

In 1998 South Carolina finally made interracial marriages legal. land of the free, or something...i think.... :(
Reply
#11
Musgrave better not justify support for the amendment by saying ###### marriage is unconstitutional.. That's a bushism. Amendment = change to the constitution. Unconstitutional = against some or all parts of the constitution.

Basically it's saying, though same-sex matrimony is unconstitutional, they have to change the constitution to make it that way.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)