' Wrote:lol you guys are gonna go onto some weird philsophical debate now.
If the apple holds all traits of a yacht how can one define yacht and apple seperately? for that matter how do you know that either of them float? You see them floating and all of your senses tell you that the yacht and apple are two seperate objects floating but suppose these thougt processes are just the result of a mad scientist poking and prodding your brain which he keeps in a jar.
An apple can only be a
yacht if it inherits
ALL of its properties from
yacht.
A
yacht is a subclass of
boat (or
ship if it's big enough), so the
apple would have to have
ALL the properties of
boat.
Let's assume that that the
yacht Fr0oTy mentioned is a full-size yacht, capable of transporting
human objects (i.e. Not a
toy). Even it if was a
toy, the resulting properties would still be the same - only with different values.
Are there a certain properties of
yacht that make it unique from other instances of [/i]boat[/i]?
Size? Shape? Propulsion method? Number of toilet paper rolls?
If you could make the properties and property values of
apple match the properties and property values of
yacht, then yes...an apple couple be a
used as a yacht.
If you can make
apple big enough to transport a
human - assuming it still carries the "floating" property - then
apple couple be a subclass of
boat
However, a
yacht that does not float would still be a
yacht with the floating property set to false.
An
apple with the floating property set to false would merely be a drowned
apple that was formerly used as a
yacht.
SO...no, an
apple is not a
yacht
But, we're talking about sentences here....
Is a question a sentence? I still say yes.
Is a statement a sentence? Yes.
Is a question a statement? No.